Blog home/Data and Research/A Guide to GFW’s Forest Change Data
Search the GFW Blog
Posted on January 6, 2016
Subscribe to the
GFW newsletter

A Guide to GFW’s Forest Change Data

Posted on January 6, 2016
Subscribe to the
GFW newsletter

By Mikaela Weisse Forest change data, which shows how tree cover changes in the world’s forests, is the backbone of our work at Global Forest Watch, and we’re constantly striving to provide better, more up-to-date data for our users. But, as we add more data, it can become harder to understand how data sets differ, and know which ones to use for your purposes. Below, we answer some common user questions about the forest change data currently on GFW, and new data that’s coming soon.

Where does all this data come from?

All of the “forest change data” on Global Forest Watch comes from satellite images (other types of data, like “forest use” and “concessions” might be derived from other sources like government surveys, field measurements, and models). Satellite images are a good way to detect forest change because they cover large areas, are consistent across time and space, and can serve as a source of information about the past. Our data mainly comes from two NASA satellite-based sensors: Landsat and MODIS, because all of the images from these two systems are free. Scientists use a variety of techniques to detect forest changes from these images, including manually identifying the changes, statistical modelling, and “machine learning” (computers are shown samples images of forest change and develop pattern recognition). The techniques used in each of the data sets are too complicated to explore in depth here, but you can read about the methods of creating each data set in its information window on GFW (accessed by clicking the icon icon).

What is resolution?

Satellite images, like all pictures, are made up of pixels. The resolution of an image is how large of an area each pixel captures—for example, a 30-meter resolution image has pixels that each capture a 30 by 30-meter land area or roughly the size of a baseball diamond. Higher resolution data allows us to see changes at a much finer scale. Most of the data on GFW is at either 30-meter or 250-meter resolution, because those are the maximum resolutions of Landsat and MODIS images, respectively. Generally speaking, satellites with higher resolution images cover a smaller area of land each day. Landsat sensors currently take 8 days to cover the Earth, while MODIS sensors now pass every spot on Earth twice a day. Because of the differences in resolution and frequency, there is a tradeoff in our data sets. Many of our lower resolution data sets can be updated more often, but don’t have as much detail as some of the higher-resolution data sets.

Why are there so many data sets?

Global Forest Watch is committed to providing the best information available on forest change. That gets tricky, however, because different data sets have advantages for different areas or purposes. Some of the data sets are best used for measuring trends and areas of deforestation (e.g. GLAD tree cover loss, PRODES), while others are better suited for monitoring forest changes that are happening now (e.g. FORMA, Terra-i, GLAD alerts). Some of the data sets cover the entire world, or most of it, while others are calibrated for a particular area and may be more accurate. Some of the data on GFW is “official” data from countries (e.g. PRODES, MINAM) and thus analysis with that data will be more respected by those governments. The table below explains the best purpose for each data set.

What’s the difference between alert and non-alert data?

Many of the “alert” products like Terra-i and FORMA, are intended to help identify areas where recent clearing is likely to have occurred—calculated based on changes in the vegetation as seen from satellites. They are often coarse, but updated as frequently as daily. Their pixels of loss are more warnings than confirmation of wholesale clearing like the annual GLAD tree cover loss. Some of the upcoming data products, such as GLAD alerts (distinct from the annual global data) and FORMA 250 (currently, FORMA is at 500-m resolution), offer more reliable estimates of loss, but are still intended to flag new places of potential loss rather than the exact location of loss. Ideally, these alerts will help users prioritize areas for further investigation using verification methods, such as field visits, scrutinizing up-to-date satellite imagery, or flying drones to confirm recent changes.

Which data are right?

There may be cases where different data sets show different locations of forest change. This is inevitable—all data sets use different methods (some of them slight differences, some of them major), may measure different things, and all have some amount of inaccuracy. It is impossible to say which data is “right” and which data is “wrong” in every case.  A conservative approach is to focus on areas where multiple alert products agree—these areas are very likely to have real forest changes. You can also always reach out to the GFW discussion forum to see if other users have suggestions for how to address your needs. Here’s a quick guide to the various forest change data sets currently on Global Forest Watch, and those coming soon. If you have questions on these data sets, please reach out to our community through the GFW discussion forum.

NameCoverageResolutionStart DateUpdatesSourceBest Purpose
GLAD tree cover lossGlobal30 m2001AnnuallyHansen/ UMD/ Google/ USGS/ NASAEstimate the area of tree cover loss globally, regionally, nationally, and sub-nationally; explore trends over the last 14 years
FORMAHumid Tropics500 mJan 2006MonthlyWRI/ CGDDetect potential new places of large scale clearing in the humid tropics
Terra-iLatin America250 mJan 2004MonthlyCIATDetect potential new places of tree cover loss in Latin America
SADBrazilian Amazon250 mJan 2008MonthlyImazonDetect potential new places of deforestation and degradation in the Brazilian Amazon
QUICCAll land below 37°N5 kmOct 2011QuarterlyNASADetect potential new places of recent vegetation cover loss, including outside of the humid tropics
NameCoverageResolutionStart DateUpdatesSourceBest Purpose
GLAD tree cover loss alertsPeru, Republic of Congo, Kalimantan (Indonesia), soon humid tropics30 mJan 2015WeeklyHansen/ UMDRapidly detect potential new places of tree cover loss at a high spatial resolution
FORMA 250Humid Tropics250 mTBDEvery 16 daysWRI/ CGDRapidly detect potential new places of tree cover loss in the humid tropics
SAD+Brazilian Amazon30 mTBDMonthlyImazonDetect potential new places of deforestation and degradation in the Brazilian Amazon at a high spatial resolution
Terra-iHumid Tropics250 mTBDMonthlyCIATDetect potential new places of tree cover loss in the humid tropics
PRODESBrazilian Amazon30 m2000AnnuallyINPE (Brazilian government)Estimate “official” deforestation area and rates in the Brazilian Amazon
GuyraGran Chaco (Paraguay, Bolivia, and Argentina)30 m2011MonthlyGuyra ParaguayEstimating deforestation area and rates, and detect new places of deforestation in the dry forests of the Gran Chaco at a high spatial resolution
MINAMPeru30 m2001AnnuallyMINAM (Peruvian government)Estimate “official” deforestation area and rates in the humid tropical forests of Peru

BANNER PHOTO: Landscape in Red Earth Township, Dongquan County, Yunnan Province, China. Photo by Louis Putzel for CIFOR (Flickr).

Latest articles

Forest in Sweden

Timber Harvesting and Climate Change Are Depleting Europe’s Mature Forests

A new study found that important tall, mature forests are declining in some parts of Europe due to timber harvesting and climate change.

Timber logging

Monitoring Forest Degradation for the EU Deforestation Regulation Using GFW

Under the EUDR, wood products entering the EU market must be degradation-free. Tools like GFW can help companies monitor for degradation.


The Latest Data Confirms: Forest Fires Are Getting Worse

The latest data on forest fires confirms: Fires are becoming more widespread, burning nearly twice as much tree cover today as 20 years ago.

fetching comments...